...One of the most significant advantages of restorative justice– which is often emphasised – is its capacity to give victims a voice: it allows them to tell their story and explain the ways in which the crime has hurt them and affected their and others’ lives. Feminists have long encouraged the telling and hearing of women’s stories (in law) as a means to express alternative viewpoints and to disrupt the monotony of the dominant discourse. But the framework within which they are told and heard limits the expression and understandings of these stories, and so the structures they are told within must be challenged and rearranged. For instance, the criminal justice system restricts the victim’s explanation of events at trial by the nature of the questions she is asked, and in rape laws the categories and language cannot capture the hurt, pain, shame and objectification of sexual assault that survivors have expressed in empirical research. Restorative justice does not have the same restrictions.

...Seen in this way, it is important to emphasise that restorative justice provides a different space – rather than just more space – in which victims can tell their stories of rape. Of course, it is possible, as critics have argued, that restorative conferences, and other forums in which the rape victim-survivor is face-to-face with the offender, might replicate and reinforce the gendered power dynamics, with the offender restricting what the victim-survivor feels she can say. Even so, by placing the crime of rape within a different framework and paradigm it provides a different perspective from which to interrogate the harm of rape, and from here to inform and improve the legal response. Having seemed to have reached an impasse in the criminal law, restorative justice could provide a means by which to explore more radical options and provoke ideas for future direction.

Read the full article.