Source: (2007) Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in School Psychology. Mount Saint Vincent University.
Youth-to-Parent abuse is a form of family violence that has received
minimal attention both at a societal level and in the academic literature. Researchers are
unable to say with any degree of certainly if or how youth-to-parent abuse is different
than spousal/partner, child or elder abuse. The Restorative Justice Program in Halifax,
Nova Scotia receives approximately sixty such cases a year. Using a qualitative
phenomenological approach that incorporated feminist-informed research principles, this
study investigated the experiences of six parents, four mothers and one couple. All five
cases involved families where the youth had acted out violently against his/her parents.
Subsequently the parents called the police and in all cases the youth were referred to the
Restorative Justice program for resolution. Participants took part in audio-taped
interviews that lasted from ninety minutes to two and a half hours. A semi-structured
interview with open-ended questions encouraged parents to reconstruct their experiences
as narratives. The findings were analyzed using a reflective structural analysis
(Moustakas, 1994) and Kirby & McKenna’s (1989) adaptation of the constant
comparison method.
Parents’ descriptions of their youths’ behaviors met the definition of youth-toparent
abuse. The findings are organized around five focus areas: Power Struggles,
Parents’ Construction of their Children’s Problems, Parents’ Perceptions of Their Roles
and Responsibilities, Negative Responses from the Systems and Positive Responses from
the Systems. Themes emerged from each focus area and include: negative school
experiences, family influences, labeling, cultural influences, negative peer influences,
setting limits, persuasive talks, ambivalence, never give up, blaming the parents, ineffectual solutions/band-aid solutions, some solutions made the problems worse, not
taking the problem seriously, parents felt heard, non-judgmental, help provided for
parents and youth, complex solutions, hopeful futures.
A nested ecological theoretical model (Cottrell & Monk, 2004) captured the
myriad of influences found to contribute to youth-to-parent abuse. Four levels contribute
to the model: Ontogenetic (individual characteristics), Macrosystem (media images),
Exosystem (social services, schools, peers), and the Microsystem (family influences).
The findings supported that a complex interrelatedness between the four levels influenced
the youths’ behavior. The findings of this project illuminate the need for an integrated
holistic approach when providing support to parents who suffer youth-to-parent abuse.
Implications for future research highlight the need for research that investigates
individual characteristics of the youth such as early aggression, mental health issues, and
substance abuse. Further investigation into how negative school experiences affect youth
and what role power dynamics play on the family warrant exploration.
An integrated approach to youth-to-parent abuse is suggested where a familysystems
modal of intervention addresses individual needs separately and family’s need
simultaneously. The Restorative Justice process was successful from some of the parents’
perspective because the needs of the youth (offender) and the victims (mothers) were
addressed. (Author’s abstract)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now