Source: (2013) Undergraduate Transitional Justice Review. 4(1):2-18.
In the following pages, restorative justice is discussed in both
theoretical and practical terms. The difficulties inherent to defining
restorative justice are discussed and the United Nations’ definition is
accepted for the following analysis. A rights-based criticism of
restorative justice is outlined and revealed as a weak counterargument
when considered. The value of several restorative justice processes,
namely truth commissions and family/community circles, are
demonstrated to be useful forms of creating justice and improving
communal relationships after an offense. Ultimately, restorative
justice processes are revealed as having the potential to contribute to
Western justice systems and to remedy the shortcomings of
retributive justice. (author’s abstract)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now