Source: (2006) In Michael W. Dowdle, Ed., Public Accountability, Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 115-156.
“My purpose in this chapter…..to try to bring a bit of order to an important and nested set of inquiries. The first objective, therefore, is to argue for a way of thinking about accountability that provides some analytic purchase when sorting through myriad claims of accountability deficits and when attempting to design acceptable accountability regimes. I begin in the next section by “unpacking accountability” to demonstrate that accountability talk is at base talk about the answer to six linked questions — answers that will form the basic building blocks of what I will refer to as “accountability regimes.” These questions take on multiple meanings in diverse contexts, but my claim is that they are a set of questions that must be addressed to make sense of any claim about the efficacy of accountability.” (excerpt)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now