Source: (2000) In Truth v. justice: The morality of truth commissions, eds. Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, 189-210. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Greenawalt asks a fundamental question in the introduction to his essay. Is it morally acceptable to condition the mandate of a truth commission on the granting of amnesty to perpetrators of past abuses? This question is predicated in part on Greenawalt’s assertion that amnesty for murderers and torturers involves a degree of injustice. Thus Greenawalt asks another fundamental question. If perpetrators are granted amnesty, is the injustice warranted or justifiable? With these questions in mind, Greenawalt explores key subjects: amnesty in relation to justice and injustice; justifications for amnesty, and the kinds of amnesty that are justified; amnesty and restorative justice; and due process for alleged violators of human rights when those people are granted amnesty.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now