Murray Short considers that the book adds little to the ongoing consideration of effective penal policy and is seriously inaccurate and misleading in many respects. To support his view he gives examples of Fraserâ€™s selective use of data, misuse of statistics, internally inconsistent argument, limited research, false logic and invalid measures….
Wayne Goodall agrees about the misuse of statistics, then goes on to address another shortcoming â€“ Fraserâ€™s ability to quote (or misquote) an individual case in order to generalise from the particular. Goodall also pays special attention to Fraserâ€™s analysis of imprisonment rates in New Zealand. In Goodallâ€™s view, the book is either a brilliantly created story taking obfuscation to new heights or just the work of a seriously inept analyst. He considers that there is little in the book that is portrayed fairly and in places it is simply wrong.
Kim Workman focuses on the last chapter of Fraserâ€™s book, which sets out recommended changes to current sentencing policy….
While providing no research to support his claim, Fraser rejects the substantial evidence which shows that firstly, offenders can be rehabilitated and secondly, that there are psychological and sociological factors which contribute to crime. He also rejects the idea that the conduct of children and adolescents can be modified away from offending behaviour. His solution is simple â€“ lock people up quickly, and for a long time. His sentencing policies are impossible to cost, but are conservatively estimated to be in the realm of $5 – $10 billion a year.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now