Back to RJ Archive

Coercive feminism.

Urs, Tara
June 4, 2015

Source: (2014) Columbia Human Rights Review. 46(1):85-157.

Section I begins with a descriptive account of American
domestic violence policy and the global domestic violence movement
that is patterned on it. Section II describes the formal (legal) and
informal (restorative) response to domestic violence in Cambodia.
Section III sets out two critiques of the American system: an antiessentialist
critique and a critique of criminalization. Section IV
applies those critiques to the Cambodian domestic violence law.
Finally, Section V of this article suggests that lessons from Cambodia
have broader implications for the international human rights
approach to domestic violence. (excerpt)

Tags:

Abstract
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now