Source: (2002) In, Elmar G.M. Weitekamp and Han-Jurgen Kerner, Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations. Deon, UK: Willan Publishing. Pp. 90-109.
Restorative justice has gained considerably in appeal in recent years. People from a wide spectrum of philosophical and political perspectives find restorative justice attractive and promising for a variety of reasons and aims: some see in it an affirmation of victims; some, a firm stance emphasizing personal accountability for wrongdoing but without retribution or harsh punishment; others, a return to and strengthening of community; others, a stratagem for cost-savings; and more. George Pavlich steps into the wide-ranging complex of arguments and hopes for restorative justice to offer an analysis of some major themes that underscore two of restorative justice’s key promises: (a) the institution of a form of justice absent the state’s repressive or rehabilitative responses to crime; and (b) the nurture of harmonious communities that practice restorative rather than state-centered formal justice. Examining justice and community through deconstructionist lenses, Pavlich construes restorative justice as a way of challenging, continuously, any given calculation of justice and collective solidarity.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now