Back to RJ Archive

Dispute resolution options for sexual harassment claims: Is the forum the message?

Smith Geula, Marianne
June 4, 2015

Source: Paper presented at the University of Massachusetts Boston Conflict Studies Conference, held in Boston, Massachusetts.

Sexual harassment in the workplace is pervasive enough to warrant legal recourse under federal and state statutes. Harassment is largely underreported, yet private sector employers spend millions of dollars annually in the defense and settlement of harassment claims. The discrepancy between the underreporting of harassment and the high costs of addressing the problem indicates the need for more effective and efficient ways of managing this type of conflict. In this paper Marianne Smith Geula reviews the legal definitions of sexual harassment and describes phases of a harassment dispute. She also distinguishes common dispute resolution options and analyzes how different processes serve the interests of the parties to the dispute. In this regard, she highlights an inherent conflict between the employer as a party in a harassment claim and the employer’s unilateral advantage in determining the type of conflict resolution process being used to deal with the conflict.


AbstractCourtsSex OffenseStatutes and Legislation
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now