This paper presents a reflection on the reasons which motivate the evaluation of restorative justice practices. In a social and institutional domain crowded with believes and symbols it debates what this need for understanding means. With the help of simple questions:who evaluates for what reason,what is evaluated and how,it proposes to researchers a small exercise in scientific hygiene useful for both improving their necessary distance and for understanding better the difficulties of evaluative reasoning within the field of restorative justice.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now