Source: (2003) Fordham Urban Law Journal. 31: 69-97.
This essay will critique the GJPâ€™s [Georgia Justice Project] encouragement of confessions in the context of the secular American justice system via comparison with the treatment of confessions under ancient Jewish law. Specifically, this essay posits that the absolute prohibition on the use of confessions in a legal system firmly rooted in religious values recognizes the danger inherent in combining the act of speaking of oneâ€™s sins for religious penance with the use of such confessions in the criminal adjudication process. The Jewish legal system avoids these inherent dangers by completely devaluing the accusedâ€™s confession. The GJP, in contrast, merges the process of seeking absolution with the criminal adjudication of the clientâ€™s criminal case, not only running the risk of exposing the client to greater criminal liability, but also risking devaluing the act of speaking ones sins to achieve true spiritual repentance by compelling confession as a condition to legal representation. (excerpt)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now