Back to RJ Archive

Gearing Justice Action to Victim Satisfaction: Contrasting Two Justice Philosophies: Retribution and Redress

Fattah, Ezzat A
June 4, 2015

Source: (2004) In, Hendrik Kaptein and Marijke Malsch. Crime, Victims, and Justice. Essays on Principles and Practice. Hampshire, England and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. Pp. 16-30.

Ezzat Fattah observes that various developments in recent decades – for example, enhanced awareness of victims’ rights and the passage of victims’ right bills in a number of countries – may lead to the popular perception that victims of crime are much better off now than they have ever been. It may appear that criminal justice systems have moved from emphasis on the offender and obsession with punishment to victim-centered or victim-oriented policies and objectives. However, he contends, the reality is far different from popular perception and political rhetoric. Progress has been made; gains have been achieved. Nevertheless, the situation of the vast majority of victims has scarcely improved, asserts Fattah. Fundamental change must yet occur if the real interests of victims are to become the main objectives of the criminal justice system. As Fattah explores and argues in this chapter, there must be a paradigm shift from retributive to restorative justice.

Tags:

AbstractCourtsPrisonsRestorative PracticesRJ and the WorkplaceRJ OfficeTeachers and StudentsVictim Support
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now