Rethinking: It strikes me that the Justice system is supposed to be an almost cold and impartial system in many respects and this call for vengeance is the exact opposite.
NL: Thatâ€™s right. We have had a sort of overreaction. Of course it is true that up until 25 years ago victims simply werenâ€™t given enough consideration in our system and they didnâ€™t have a role. It was more than that, they were just â€˜dissed.â€™ They would turn up and there would not be anywhere proper for them to sit in the court. Often they were not informed about the progress of cases so you have a rape victim who suddenly sees the man who she believes has raped her out in the street and she hasnâ€™t even been told. There were huge problems and victims just werenâ€™t thought about and it was terrible.
But the trouble is that because that has now got on to the agenda, we have gone over the top. It seems to me that it is absolutely appropriate that there are vigorous information streams to victims and that there should have been voluntary sector or government funded support schemes for victims. Victims should have somewhere safe to sit in court where they donâ€™t have to be seen or feel vulnerable to getting abused or embarrassed by the defendantâ€™s family or supporters. All that seems absolutely straight forward and right. But to then take the extra step -Â and this is really what Dame Sian Elias was arguing in her â€˜Shirley Smithâ€™ lecture last year -Â that to take the extra step to give them decision making powers just seems wrong.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now