Source: (2005) Australian Psychologist. 40(1): 63 – 69
Victims of criminal transgressions can receive compensation from various sources including government agencies, compensation orders instructing offenders to pay compensation, and as a result of victim – offender reconciliation programs. This study examined the effects of source of compensation on victim forgiveness and satisfaction with outcome. The relationship between trait empathy and forgiveness in various compensatory contexts was also examined. Seventy-ï¬ve participants (M= 33.67 years, SD= 14.28) read a scenario describing a nonviolent property crime and were randomly assigned to no compensation, government compensation, forced offender compensation, or voluntary offender compensation outcome conditions. Participants receiving compensation were more satisï¬ed with the outcome than those who did not. A condition main effect indicated that participants who received voluntary offender compensation were signiï¬cantly more forgiving than participants in the remaining conditions; however, a signiï¬cant Condition 6 Empathy interaction indicated that participants with high and low trait empathy reacted differently to some compensation conditions. Conciliatory gestures by offenders appear to facilitate forgiveness in victims primarily when they are voluntary. The question of whether some compensatory procedures are more beneï¬cial than others is contingent upon the aims of restorative justice.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now