Source: (2002) Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law. 8(1).
Contemporary psychological and legal models of behavior are still fundamentally at odds, and the impending paradigm clash may have profound, long-term consequences four our 21century legal doctrines and institutions. The 19th-century, “formative era” of American law coincided with the dominance of psychological individualism in the nation’s collective view of human nature and resulted in the institutionalization of a now antiquated model of human behavior. As we enter the new millennium, a new legal realism based on a view of human nature more consistent with contemporary psychological thinking is urged, along with a series of interlocking legal changes intended to both incorporate a more contextual view of human nature into law nad improbe the quality of justice our system currently dispenses.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now