Back to RJ Archive

Mandatory Sentencing: Implications for Judicial Independence.

Mason, Anthony
June 4, 2015

Source: (2001) Australian Journal of Human Rights. 7(2):21-30.

This article expresses concern for mandatory sentencing, which generally “insists on the incarceration of a first offender, more especially a young offender, for theft, no matter how trivial the amount involved.” The author believes that restorative justice alternatives would help decrease the likelihood of young offenders committing more crimes later in life. Rehabilitation tends to be more cost effective and ultimately leads to a “better world” in the author’s opinion. Courts in Canada and New Zealand have already sanctioned these restorative justice approaches.


AbstractCourtsJuvenilePrisonsRestorative PracticesRJ and the WorkplaceRJ in SchoolsRJ OfficeTeachers and StudentsVictim Support
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now