Back to RJ Archive

“Reconsidering indeterminate and structured sentencing.”

Tonry, Michael
June 4, 2015

Source: (1999) Sentencing & Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century (Research in Brief). No. 2 (September). Papers from the Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

With sentencing and corrections policies in America in ferment, Tonry attempts to illuminate the competing conceptions of sentencing and corrections. He focuses on arguments for and against two major approaches: indeterminate sentencing, and structured sentencing. To support his analysis, Tonry also summarizes the basic history and salient characteristics of each approach.

Tags:

Abstract
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now