Back to RJ Archive

Restorative justice for multinational corporations

March 21, 2014

Accordingly, Part I explains deterrence theory, its grounding in the methodology of law and economics, and its status as the dominant contemporary theory of criminal punishment. It then proposes using anti-bribery law, particularly the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as a kind of case study in federal extraterritorial deterrence, and explains why the FCPA serves this purpose well. Using empirical evidence on the FCPA’s impact overseas, Part II builds a model to show why deterrence will tend to fail more generally in extraterritorial white-collar enforcement. It explains the unique conditions of international business and illustrates how these conditions will often produce an increase, rather than a decrease, in overseas crime. Part III then shows restorative justice to be a superior, if counterintuitive, paradigm for extraterritorial white-collar enforcement. It develops a new sentencing procedure that would promote the interests of the federal enforcement agencies, help the overseas victims of corporate crime, and requires no new legal authorization to implement. 

Reference removed.
Download the full article.

Tags:

Blog PostPotential of RJPrisonsRJ and the WorkplaceRJ in SchoolsRJ TheoryStatutes and LegislationTeachers and Students
Support the cause

We've Been Restoring Justice for More Than 40 Years

Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.

Donate Now