Source: (2007) London: THe Smith Institute.
A review of research on restorative justice (RJ) in the UK and abroad shows that across 36 direct comparisons to conventional criminal justice (CJ), RJ has, in at least two tests each: 1) substantially reduced repeat offending for some offenders, but not all; 2) doubled (or more) the offences brought to justice as diversion from CJ; 3) reduced crime victimsâ€™ post-traumatic stress symptoms and related costs; 4) provided both victims and offenders with more satisfaction with justice than CJ; 5) reduced crime victimsâ€™ desire for violent revenge against their offenders; 6) reduced the costs of criminal justice, when used as diversion
from CJ; 7) reduced recidivism more than prison (adults) or as well as prison (youths). (excerpt)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now