Source: (2000) Ditchley Foundations.
This report gives the discussion points covered by RJ practitioners and protagonists from the UK on the relevance of RJ in the UKÃ¢Â€Â™s criminal justice system. They discussed whether or not RJ practices could/should be codified; its costs relative to those of CJ practices; how to define Ã¢Â€ÂœcommunityÃ¢Â€? in the process; how public acceptance of RJ might best be achieved; what classes of offence could be addressed through RJ; and the weight carried by benefits to the victims of crime. Participants acknowledged that RJ could not be a substitute for policies and practices that alleviate poverty, lack of education and other social ills that generate crime. They concluded that since the present system of CJ was failing and rising in costs at the same time, RJ should be given a chance to prove itself.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now