Source: (2004) Essay for the Offender Reintegration Course. M.Phil in Criminology.
The title of this essay looks fairly simple for the first instance: we have two concepts and we
are looking for the possible relation between them. However, our second reaction immediately
shows the difficulties behind analysing their connection and we might say: â€œit depends onâ€. It
depends on what we call shame and what we call desistance.
This question influences the current analysis in at least three aspects. Firstly, both shame (Van
Stokkom, 2002) and desistance (Laub and Sampson, 2001; Maruna, 2001) play a mysterious role
in criminology due to the lack of clear conceptualisation and consensual definition related to
them. Therefore, despite the large number of studies in these fields, we still cannot guarantee that
we talk about the same phenomena, if we do not agree on their definitions. (excerpt)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now