Source: (2003) Alberta Law Review. 40(4): 965-989.
The author analyzes the role of victim involment in extrajudicial and judicial measures under the Youth Crimminal Justice Act and the overall direction of victim involvement and its possible impact on the development of youth justice. Unlike the Young Offenders Act, victim concerns are specifically recognized throughout the Youth Crimminal Justice Act. With respect to judicial measures, reparation should be interpreted broadly to include yound offenders’ genuine attempts to make good the harms they have caused. The concept of reparation should provide an equal opportunity to pay the costs of crime. With respect to extrajudicial measures, the role of victims is difficult to assess. The author encourages greater utilization of family confrences, as this extrajudicial measure has enjoyed success in New Zealand in reducing youtb imprisonment and producing significant levels of victim satisfaction. Victims may well play an increased role under the Youth Crimminal Justice Act, but the actual effect of both punitive and non-punitive forms of victim involvement will depend on how the new act is administered.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now