In post-authoritarian contexts, the state generally perpetrates abuses against citizens. However, in post-conflict contexts, while the state may be implicated in abusesâ€”mass violence also envelopes individuals, with neighbor turning against neighbor, engulfing whole communities.
The interventions needed following transitions from periods of repressive rule or conflicts are quite different. Posner and Vermuele have argued elsewhere â€œthat the kind of transition affects the kind of transitional justice that will occur.â€ This Article argues that the kind of transition should determine the kind of transitional justice institution utilized.
For example, the need for â€œtruthâ€ takes on much more significance in a post-authoritarian context where â€œdeception is so central to the abuses,â€ while in post-conflict contexts where abuses are not â€œhiddenâ€ and were committed openly, â€œtruthâ€ in and of itself takes on much less significance. Yet, the same institution is usually employed in drastically different circumstances.
Citations omitted. Read the whole article.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now