Source: (2000) Photocopied draft.
Shenk and Zehr examine principles and practices of research or Ã¢Â€ÂœknowingÃ¢Â€? in light of basic principles of restorative justice. In a traditional approach to research, the researcher is the objective expert who gathers essential data to discover truth and determine meaning (where truth and meaning are also considered to be objective). Critiques from various movements have faulted this approach as being unaware of its own fundamental and biasing perspectives, and as disenfranchising the subjects under study. Shenk and Zehr apply a similar critique to the traditional criminal justice system and its pursuit of Ã¢Â€ÂœknowledgeÃ¢Â€? or Ã¢Â€ÂœtruthÃ¢Â€? through its processes. They argue that restorative justice leads to a transformative approach to research or Ã¢Â€ÂœknowingÃ¢Â€? that respects and empowers the stakeholders involved in and affected by the events and processes.
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.Donate Now