Source: (2012) Crime and Justice Bulletin. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Number 150
After adjusting for other factors in the intention-to-treat analyses, no significant differences were found between
conference and court participants in the proportion re-offending, the seriousness of their re-offending, the time to the first
proven re-offence or the number of proven re-offences. Non-significant results were obtained regardless of whether the
definition of re-offending included or excluded justice procedures offences. In the as-treated analyses, the results were
similar. (excerpt)
Your donation helps Prison Fellowship International repair the harm caused by crime by emphasizing accountability, forgiveness, and making amends for prisoners and those affected by their actions. When victims, offenders, and community members meet to decide how to do that, the results are transformational.
Donate Now